AI register
Enterprise AI register: what it contains and what it is for
An AI register is the list of every AI system a company uses, each with its purpose, its owner, its risk class under the EU AI Act and the related evidence: it is the starting point of any AI governance.
Why keep a register
The AI Act's obligations do not apply to "AI" in general. They depend on each system and on its use. An assistant that summarises meetings and a tool that screens job applications do not carry the same rules. The second falls in principle under high risk (Annex III, point 4); the first does not.
To know which rules apply, you first need to know which AI systems are running. That is the register's job. Without it, none of the other questions of AI governance has an answer.
The regulation does not use the word "register" for an internal inventory, and does not prescribe one under that name for every company. But each of its obligations concerns a specific system: without an inventory, you cannot show you have examined them.
Not to be confused with the EU database
The AI Act creates a European database. Providers register the high-risk systems listed in Annex III there. Public authorities that deploy them register their use (Article 49). A private company that deploys a system has no such registration duty, unless it acts on behalf of a public authority. Its internal register remains its own.
What a register contains
| Field | Why |
|---|---|
| The system and its vendor | Knowing what you are talking about, including the AI features of a software suite. |
| The purpose | The risk class depends on the use, not on the technology. |
| The named owner | A person. It is the first thing an inspector asks for. |
| The company's role | Deployer, or provider if it puts the system into service under its own name (Article 3). |
| The risk class, dated | A classification changes when the use changes: the history must be kept. |
| Obligations and deadlines | Transparency since 2 August 2026, high risk from 2 December 2027. |
| Attached evidence | Each piece with its date and its author. |
| Level of oversight | Declared, or connected and measured. |
The AI systems that get forgotten
A register is only worth something if it is complete. Three families often escape the inventory:
- individual accounts, opened by employees without going through IT;
- features switched on by an update to software already in place;
- AI built into a software suite, which cannot be connected. It still enters the register: the regulation asks you to govern it, not necessarily to measure it.
The AI literacy obligation (Article 4) concerns the staff who use AI systems. The register also says who uses them.
From register to evidence
A register kept in a spreadsheet shows the state of the day. In front of an inspector, you need to show what was true on a past date: when a system was classified, by whom, on what basis. That is why the risk class must be kept over time and every piece of evidence dated. The AI Act compliance page sets out which evidence to attach to each obligation.
How to build it
- Declare. A few questions per AI system: purpose, owner, vendor. The register fills itself.
- Classify. The risk class under the AI Act, and the obligations that follow.
- Connect what can be connected. A connected AI system is measured, not just declared.
In the Cockpit, the register, the risk classes kept over time and the dated evidence sit in one place, whatever the vendors. The Factory is the offer designed to connect the systems already in place.
Do you know which AI systems run in your company, and who answers for them?
Request an assessmentA free 30-minute first conversation, no commitment.
Frequently asked questions
Is an AI register mandatory?
The AI Act does not prescribe an internal register under that name for every company. But each of its obligations concerns a specific system and use: without an inventory, a company cannot show it has examined them.
Should Copilot, Agentforce or the AI built into our software be listed?
Yes. A company that uses an AI system under its own authority, in a professional capacity, is its deployer within the meaning of Article 3, whatever the vendor.
How does it differ from the EU database?
The EU database receives the registration of Annex III high-risk systems by their providers, and of their use by public authorities (Article 49). An internal register covers every AI system in the company.
Sources
Sources opened on 12 October 2026.
- AI Act, Article 3: definitions (provider, deployer)
- AI Act, Article 4: AI literacy
- AI Act, Article 6: classification of high-risk systems
- AI Act, Article 49: registration in the EU database
- AI Act, Article 50: transparency obligations
- AI Act Service Desk: high-risk guidelines, employment (Annex III, point 4)
- European Commission, AI Act Service Desk: implementation timeline
Updated 12 October 2026